Wikipedia:Peer review/Mario/archive2

Mario

Archive: Wikipedia:Peer review/Mario/archive1

The article seems to be nearing featured status. There should probably be a few more references; my question is, what else is left to cite? Also, is there anything other improvements to be made to this article to reach featured status? —The Gr e at Llama ^talk 00:23, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 18:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see more automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, —The Gr e at Llama ^talk 01:32, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The characteristics section seems overly long and there are several unfree images that don't seem to be adding to the article. For instance, we don't need to know what a fire flower looks like, especially since the text is describing Mario's powers and abilities. Jay32183 02:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the characteristics section can be trimmed a bit by removing the discussion on his age. There isn't an official age listed in any source, the entire section is based on speculation. Unsourced speculation is considered a bad thing in Wikipedia articles. Jay32183 20:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Would it be at all possible to combine the paragraph about Mario being a doctor in "Occupations and hoobies" with the "Doctor Mario" section? It seems to me that the prose would flow better if the those connected ideas were consolidated.Jay32183 03:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]